Cindy McCain’s Outfit Likely Cost $300,000

This is an aside titled 'Cindy McCain’s Outfit Likely Cost $300,000' dated 9/4/08

Vanity Fair estimates the cost of Cindy McCain’s Tuesday night outfit. Oscar de la Renta dress: $3,000 Chanel J12 White Ceramic Watch: $4,500 Three-carat diamond earrings: $280,000 Four-strand pearl necklace: $11,000–$25,000 Shoes, designer unknown: $600 Total: Between $299,100 and $313,100 If her husband is elected, might we expect her to build a farm behind the White House and dress up in shepherdess and milkmaid costumes? (Adds TPM: “Of course, when it comes to measuring elitism, what’s a $300,000 outfit compared to … whatever it is that’s supposed to be elitist about the Obamas?”)

Posted by Joanne on Sep. 4, 2008

blog comments powered by Disqus

A collection of interesting ideas curated by
Joanne McNeil. About ➚

Subscribe to RSS
- Deep Glamour interviews PaleoFuture blogger Matt Novak about retrofuturism, "There is an important distinction I feel that we should make between personal nostalgia and societal nostalgia. Personal nostalgia is that smell of your first teddy bear or the feeling of your first kiss. Personal nostalgia is a wonderful part of the human experience. But I feel that personal nostalgia is anecdotal and thus dangerous when used as ammunition to describe this desire to return to a 'better time.'" Previously, DG interviewed me about the glamour of science fiction.
  2010-09-08 12:44:05
- Matthew Battles on Google Scribe. Previously: Accidental Storytelling.
  2010-09-08 12:36:30
- Some new podcasts. One: I was a guest on Steady Diet of Film talking about Eat Pray Love and other chick flicks. Also in my car a few weeks ago, I decided to record another TM podcast. Something I haven't done since... February. It's more on anonymity. I think I said it better six months ago. Anyway, more to come.
  2010-09-07 23:14:25
- Caring for Your Online Introvert is one of the posts I was super embarrassed about after pressing "publish," but it has since received a reaction better than I could have dreamed, from Kottke to Brainpicker to a bunch of tweets and retweets that mean a lot to me. Anyway, I submitted a proposal to turn the post into a panel at SXSWi next year, and would really appreciate your vote. Also, be sure to check out the other panels on Alexis Madrigal's list at the Atlantic. Thanks.
  2010-08-25 13:41:33
- Summer hours at The Tomorrow Museum. This may sound silly, but I'm cutting back my internet use this summer... as I work on writing a book about the internet. I've got a few long posts in progress, I hope to have ready in the coming weeks, but the short link posts require monitoring the web in a way I just can't handle right now.
  2010-06-16 06:09:13
- Mefi on "collapsitarianism," (linking to my post on Survival Creativity,) wonders why Kevin Kelly's revival of the term never caught on. But here it is in a recent NYT story on "life without oil."
  2010-06-16 06:06:16
- “The days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end pretty quickly... Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity.” - Mark Zuckerberg
  2010-05-13 19:07:21
- "We heard from a guy in Toronto who’d hosted a Kill Your Facebook account party. The price of admission was to delete your Facebook account. Over 200 people attended." - Sabbath Manifesto's Dan Rollman, also founder of URDB, in an interview with Make Work Meaningful. Meanwhile, there's this group and this pledge.
  2010-05-12 15:24:14
- Here's a nice roundup of commenter communities by New York's Doree Shafrir (who along with Sam Anderson keeps writing these great Fast Company meets New Yorker style articles for the magazine.) I don't often read comments, except on funny sites like Wonkette, where they seem to keep a joke alive. As I've written before, commenting seems driven by the same "annotation impulse" as bathroom wall graffiti. Every once in a while you'll find something poignant, funny, brilliant, clever, but it's also a place (and largely) for unpleasantries. Anonymous free speech is one of the most powerful things the internet provides us, that doesn't mean it can't be used for dumb or hateful things. Eventually I plan to disable comments since I don't have sufficient time to monitor them. I'd much rather people responded to my posts on their own blogs or over email. This is true for most single-author sites. It's easier to keep up a lively discussion with multi-author sites because already the other bloggers are there to chime in (or rush to your defense.) Doree also points out that "Gawker introduced comments in 2005 by sending out invitations to a select group of readers, making access seem (relatively) prestigious." Gawker comments were hilarious then. I'm not sure that this kind of roll out of a self-selecting community could sustain today as 2005 was before Twitter and Tumblr. Also, I'd really love to see a Venn Diagram of former Gawker commenters and the first thousand Tumblrs, as there seems to be a large intersection.
  2010-05-11 15:08:47
- Sorry. Deleted previous post, which was a draft I began to write. I love MarsEdit a lot, but I'd love it a lot more if the "send to weblog" and "save draft buttons" were not so close to each other and had more distinctive icons
  2010-05-10 02:27:15
More asides»
Blogroll
Powered by WordPress, styled by Bogart 0.8.

Blogroll

Categories

Sponsors

Sponsor

Recent Posts

New Showcase