This is an aside titled 'When It Comes to Debate Format, Compromise Hurts Everyone' dated 10/8/08

Why was the debate last night instantly forgettable? Why did neither candidate stray far from his respective stump speech? Because both candidates gain from a format designed to minimize gaffes and specifics. More from Lindsay Beyerstein: “If the debates are to add value, they must push the candidates out of their comfort zones and force them to engage answer questions that their handlers won’t let them tackle on the campaign trail. The best way to do that is to have debates on relatively narrow topics…This time around, we should have had debates exclusively devoted to energy, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the economic crisis.”

Posted by Joanne on Oct. 8, 2008 Tagged: , , ,

blog comments powered by Disqus