This is an aside titled 'Storytelling after Twitter' dated 10/29/09

Joel Achenbach in the Washington Post on Age of Twitter lit; “There is much confusion about what, precisely, should vanish in this broad media makeover. Is it print? Or just long stories? Or just bad, boring, dishwater-dull stories? Complicating the situation is that the online world is both increasingly dominant and, for many media organizations, stubbornly unprofitable.” He goes on to say, “The sages say that we’ve reached a situation where “content creation” no longer pays. Only “aggregation” is profitable. It’s a freak variant of Darwinism — the survival of the parasitic. But obviously there will be little of value to aggregate if only rich people and dilettantes can afford to type up their thoughts.” –which I don’t at all agree with, but generally this is one of the better looks at tech-influence literature. (via.)

Posted by Joanne on Oct. 29, 2009 Tagged: , , ,

blog comments powered by Disqus