Building the Body Better: John Hockenberry and Hugh Herr at the MIT Museum
“How do we marry technology to humanity?” asked John Hockenberry, journalist, Distinguished Fellow at MIT Media Lab, and now morning show host at WNYC. Last week, he gave a talk at the MIT Museum with Hugh Herr, director of Media Lab’s Biomechatronics Group.
Hockenberry began by explaining the shifting attitudes toward medical technology since the 1976 car accident that left him in a wheelchair:
At that time, being a parapalygic was an extraodinarily fringe activity in mainstream America and was percieved to be at first something that was horrific, secondly something staggeringly poigniant around the 1980s, and as we got toward the end of the 90s, it became something, perhaps not mainstream, but at least suggesting that what i had been doing in this wheelchair for previous thirty years was not… just worthy of memoirs and stories of overcoming obstacles. It was in fact central to the issue: how do we marry technology to humanity in a way that is organic to the body, appropriate to the spirit, and sustainable to the community?
It became clear that few insitutitions or people had spent any time thinking about this at all and it was also clear … that people with disabilities had spent all their lives thinking prescicely about how to make pieces of technology — often pieces of junk that had been handed to them by doctors — into something that could be used on a sustainable human scale that would be useful to them and allow them to participate in the community
Herr raised the point that what at first seemed to be an extraordinary disadvantage, actually provided opportunities he never otherwise would conceive of, “I could be as tall as I like, not just 5′10… and, gee, I could put materials here with density less than the human body.” He could even work on his leg to improve his rock-climbing skills.
Runners with prosthetic blade “cheetah legs” are known for their high speeds, an advantage of more than 30 percent. South Africa’s Oscar Pistorius is even ineligible to compete in the Beijing Olympics. (Update 4/18/08: Please read the comments to see an explanation why this “advantage” is negligible. Here is a good case for why he should be allowed to run.) Will we need an Extra-Special Olympics for those among us with super-human skills? Because of the Iraq war, there are a lot more people now qualified for such an event. It’s even a status symbol among patients at Walter Reed.
There’s a spike in biomechatronics innovation and funding after every war. DARPA and the Department of Veterans Affairs are behind most current projects. Now, no one wants a Sleeper Cylon leg — but that’s why open source design labs like FabLab are also important to the design process.
People already see artificial limbs as upgrades. So why not have a third arm? I have heard that DARPA research has a cap on biomedical devices that go beyond human ability. In the meantime, a major rule of design is forget those beige attempts at realistic “flesh.” As Herr explained, “Mannequins –creepy. Robots –cool.”
You can watch the lecture on the website (although, it seems to be down at the moment. For now, here is a video of a forum with Hockenberry, Herr and Segway’s Dean Kamen. You can also watch Hockenberry’s 2005 appearance on the Daily Show.) And if you are anywhere near Cambridge on April 29, you don’t want to miss the next Soap box event featuring Sherry Turkle, author of the The Second Self, one of the first and most influential books on the user’s experience in the digital world, and Cynthia Breazeal, MIT’s leading researcher in humanoid robotics. These “salon-style” conversations with scientists are participatory and fun. After the lecture, the audience separates into small groups and brainstorms question on tablet pcs.
Related links:
- “You Don’t Understand Our Audience” What I learned about network television at Dateline NBC, John Hockenberry for Tech Review Jan 2008
- The Infinite Mind with Kurt Vonnegut
- “The World’s First Powered Ankle,” Tech Review, May 2007.
- “A Question of Mind Over Matter”, Wired 2006.
At that time, being a parapalygic was an extraodinarily fringe activity in mainstream America and was percieved to be at first something that was horrific, secondly something staggeringly poigniant around the 1980s, and as we got toward the end of the 90s, it became something, perhaps not mainstream, but at least suggesting that what i had been doing in this wheelchair for previous thirty years was not… just worthy of memoirs and stories of overcoming obstacles. It was in fact central to the issue: how do we marry technology to humanity in a way that is organic to the body, appropriate to the spirit, and sustainable to the community?
